Overview How to use Before / After Demo Showcases About Me iPattern

Every answer, backed by a
document you can point to.

When a client or their auditor sends you a security questionnaire, SecurityReview fills it in from your own security documents — citing the document behind every answer, and leaving anything it can't back up blank. No bluffing, nothing you can't stand behind in the audit.

For vendors & suppliers

Interactive walkthrough — sample questionnaire

0
Questions in
0
Drafted & cited (document-backed)
0
Left blank (no evidence)
0
Flagged for a closer look
OPEN THE DEMO • OPEN THE DEMO •

What SecurityReview will not do

No document, no answer.

Answer from general knowledge

If it isn't in your evidence library, it doesn't exist.

Soften a "No" into "working towards it"

A blank stays blank, and a No stays No, until you decide otherwise.

Cite a document it didn't read

It will never cite a document outside the library or guess a section number.

Submit for you

Approving writes the record; the finished questionnaire goes back to your client from you, under your name.

Evidence library · 41 docs

The only place SecurityReview is allowed to read.

Your policies, runbooks, SOC 2 report, and last quarter's access review — and nothing outside them. SecurityReview has no general knowledge of your company, so it can't invent an answer that sounds right but isn't in your documents.

Policy
ISMS-POL-01
Cited in 3 drafted answers this workbook
Audit report
SOC 2 Type II FY25
Uploaded this cycle
Engineering
Secure SDLC v3
Sourced 5 answers · §2, §5, §5.3, §5.4, §8

How to use

The tool itself, walked through.

Signed in as Priya RamanSample workbook
Head of Security · Kestrel Managed Services

118questions in
—drafted & cited
—no source · blank
—need a look
Review · drafted answers waiting on collection

Nothing drafted yet — the evidence library has not been read.

9 blank

Priya Raman · Head of Security

Sample workbook — nothing here is sent anywhere. Open the full tool to drive it yourself, full size.

Before / After

Same 118 questions, two ways to answer them.

Why nine answers stay blank.

Before — manual

Someone answers all 118.

118

Relies on memory. No evidence linked. Masks the gaps. High deal-breaker risk — including the nine that shouldn't have been answered at all.

After — SecurityReview

109 drafted and cited. 9 left honest.

109 + 9

109 drafted & cited, 9 left honest. Shows the gaps instead of hiding them — audit-ready, not a gap the tool tried to mask.

Why nine stay blank

The blanks aren't failures of the tool.

No key-rotation policy exists to cite. No sub-processor list exists either.
A penetration test outside the window. A business-continuity dry-run not logged since February 2025. A contractor background-check attestation that's missing. BYOD logs that don't sync. A mobile encryption policy with no sign-off. A vulnerability-remediation SLA that isn't specified anywhere.
Log retention has an answer SecurityReview will not draft for you: No. A No is a decision. It belongs to a person.